Bullet Penetration
One never ending source of discussion and dissension is when different
calibers and bullets are compared. Numerous studies have delivered
many differing results when it comes to how different types of bullets
react when hitting a target. Since the design of bullets are geared
towards their impact upon soft tissue for purposes of hunting, self-defense
and military the majority of studies have concentrated upon this
aspect of terminal ballistics.
A bullet travelling through the air has a couple of basic physical
attributes. It has a given mass (in the firearms world this mass
is measured in grains) and velocity (usually measured in feet per
second [fps]) as well as a rate of spin. The mass of the projectile
is constant, the velocity depends upon the type and amount of gunpowder
in the bullet case as well as the length and type of the barrel,
and then upon the distance from the firearm (the closer to the firearm
the faster it is). The spin depends upon the type of rifling in the
barrel and also upon the distance from the end of the barrel. All
of these factors plus various other environmental factors such as
ambient temperature, humidity and air density can affect the bullet
and it's kinetic energy remaining when it stops flight through air.
What happens to the projectile upon hitting a surface depends upon
the composition of the bullet, the shape and form of the projectile
as well as it's rotation rate and speed. In addition, projectiles
will react differently depending on what type of target they hit.
Some projectiles, notably armor-piercing and military ball rounds,
are designed to not break up and deform for as long as possible,
thus penetrating as deeply as possible; other rounds such as handgun "self-defense" rounds
are designed to deform as quickly as possible and to not over penetrate.
Since so many different permutations of conditions (speed, target
type, distance, angle, bullet type, etc.) exist there is little generalization
that can be done here. Every major manufacturer of ammunition has
conducted tests of their rounds as have numerous private and public
institutions. The results are not always clear and often even contradictory.
Bullet penetration in homes
A consistent worry with people thinking about the self-defense uses
of their purchased firearms is over penetration of bullets within
their abode - be it a house or an apartment. The same applies to
potential uses outside, either into or from a vehicle or elsewhere.
Once again Hollywood has done us a great disservice in either exaggerating
or de-emphasizing effectivity of firearms; in some films a small
.32ACP round will blast an assailant off his or her feet and have
them fly several body lengths through the air from the impact. On
the other side of the power curve some films show actors taking cover
behind flimsy drywall or plywood and bullets seem to bounce off this
surface (usually to the sound effect of ricochets). None of these
scenarios come close to reality. Many people also assume that because
rifle bullets are designed to travel far and are higher-powered than
handgun rounds that they will also go through numerous walls before
stopping. This is not accurate.
Self-defense bullets are most often hollow-pointed, meaning that
the tip of the bullet is concave and not a solid sharp point. This
type of shape assists the bullet "mushrooming" or deforming
when it hits a surface, thus causing a larger frontal surface area
and subsequently slowing down faster - in the process transferring
the kinetic energy to the target. The idea behind this design is
to ensure that the bullet will not over penetrate and continue flying
on through and past the target. Even though rifle rounds such as
the .223 Remington and .308 Winchester usually have pointed tips
their design is such that the bullet starts to tumble and break up
upon penetrating a surface and therefore do not over penetrate.
Typical construction materials used in Arizona consist of wooden
frames and drywall. Studies have shown that both defensive handgun
(hollow point) and rifle rounds can travel through 2 or 3 drywalls
but then penetrate no further. This would equate to one interior
wall and then the exterior wall. The amount of energy and projectile
size after going through one wall with 2 layers of drywall is significantly
reduced in both types of rounds and may already be considered less
than lethal. A recent Mesa Police Department study shows that rifle
rounds pose less of an over penetration risk than do handgun rounds;
one curious effect is that some hollow point projectiles will hit
a drywall and have their cavity fill up with the material and subsequently
act as ball-rounds. When walls are made of cinder block or brick
the study has shown that rounds will not penetrate and no penetration
occurs using defensive handgun and .223 caliber rifles. So the myth
of a round going through the house walls then the neigbor's car and
finally their TV-set remains exactly that - a myth.
Ball rounds vs.
Hollow-points
Ball ammunition (either military or practice ammunition) is designed
to keep it's shape and form upon impact, whereas hollow-point or
defensive ammunition is meant to deform and expand upon hitting a
solid obstacle. Thus, self-defense rounds tend to leave their energy
in the object hit while ball ammunition will continue through the
object and thus tend to damage less. Please look at our Bullet
Expansion article for pictures and detailed descriptions.
Some additional reading on ballistics:
FBI Ballistic Test Protocol
Synopsis of the FBI Ballistic Test Protocol
Bullet Penetration Demonstration Fact Sheet
|